Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 9 authors, 2019-11-15

Re: [PATCH 00/50] Add log level to show_stack()

From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Date: 2019-11-12 09:59:32
Also in: linux-alpha, linux-riscv, linux-um

On Tue 2019-11-12 13:57:04, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
On (19/11/12 13:44), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
[..]
quoted
quoted
But yes, this per-code-section loglevel is problematic. The feedback
against the patchset shows that people want it also the other way.
I mean to keep pr_debug() as pr_debug().
Hmm. Right.
quoted
A solution might be to use the per-code-section loglevel only instead
of some special loglevel.
So maybe we can "overwrite" only KERN_DEFAULT loglevels?
LOGLEVEL_DEFAULT, LOGLEVEL_NOTICE, LOGLEVEL_INFO?

So we can downgrade some messages (log_store() only) or promote
some messages.

DEBUG perhaps should stay debug.
quoted
We certainly should not mess with SCHED or with anything in between
EMERG and ERR.
  [EMERG, WARN]
This is getting too complicated. It would introduce too many
hidden rules. While the explicitly passed loglevel parameter
is straightforward and clear.

I am getting more inclined to the solution introduced by this
patchset. It looks reasonable for the different use-cases.

Best Regards,
Petr
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help