Thread (80 messages) 80 messages, 6 authors, 2019-11-20

Re: [PATCH v4 07/47] soc: fsl: qe: qe.c: guard use of pvr_version_is() with CONFIG_PPC32

From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: 2019-11-15 08:11:48
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, lkml

On 15/11/2019 05.50, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 7:04 AM Rasmus Villemoes
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
+static bool qe_general4_errata(void)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
+       return pvr_version_is(PVR_VER_836x) || pvr_version_is(PVR_VER_832x);
+#endif
+       return false;
+}
+
 /* Program the BRG to the given sampling rate and multiplier
  *
  * @brg: the BRG, QE_BRG1 - QE_BRG16
@@ -223,7 +231,7 @@ int qe_setbrg(enum qe_clock brg, unsigned int rate, unsigned int multiplier)
        /* Errata QE_General4, which affects some MPC832x and MPC836x SOCs, says
           that the BRG divisor must be even if you're not using divide-by-16
           mode. */
Can you also move this comment (and fix the comment formatting so that
it's a proper function comment) to qe_general4_errata()?
I actually thought of doing that, but decided against it because the
comment not only mentions the SOCs affected, but also explains the
following math/logic. I mean, without that comment nearby, the code is

  if (qe_general4_errata())
     if (some weird condition)
        divisor++;

In contrast, I think the qe_general4_errata() is pretty self-explanatory
- is this a SOC affected by that errata (whatever that errata may be
about and what the software workaround is).

Rasmus
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help