On 15/11/2019 05.25, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 7:03 AM Rasmus Villemoes
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
+ if (of_property_read_u32(np, "cell-index", &val) &&
+ of_property_read_u32(np, "device-id", &val)) {
I know that this is technically correct, but it's obfuscated IMHO.
'val' is set correctly only when of_property_read_u32(...) is "false",
which is doubly-weird because of_property_read_u32(...) doesn't
actually return a boolean.
I would rather you break this into two if-statements like the original code.
Sure, I can do that.