Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] powerpc/traps: Print signal name for unhandled signals
From: Murilo Opsfelder Araujo <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-01 14:42:50
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 12:03:50AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 08:37 +0200, Christophe LEROY wrote:quoted
Le 31/07/2018 à 16:50, Murilo Opsfelder Araujo a écrit :quoted
This adds a human-readable name in the unhandled signal message. Before this patch, a page fault looked like: pandafault[6303]: unhandled signal 11 at 100007d0 nip 1000061c lr 7fff93c55100 code 2 in pandafault[10000000+10000] After this patch, a page fault looks like: pandafault[6352]: segfault (11) at 13a2a09f8 nip 13a2a086c lr 7fffb63e5100 code 2 in pandafault[13a2a0000+10000]]]quoted
quoted
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c[]quoted
quoted
@@ -96,6 +96,41 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__debugger_fault_handler); #define TM_DEBUG(x...) do { } while(0) #endif +static const char *signames[SIGRTMIN + 1] = { + "UNKNOWN", + "SIGHUP", // 1 + "SIGINT", // 2[]quoted
I don't think is is worth having that full table when we only use a few of them. (As discussed in v1 https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/948802/) I would suggest to instead use a function like this: static const char *signame(int signr) { if (signr == SIGBUS) return "bus error"; if (signr == SIGFPE) return "floating point exception"; if (signr == SIGILL) return "illegal instruction"; if (signr == SIGILL) return "segfault"; if (signr == SIGTRAP) return "unhandled trap"; return "unknown signal"; }trivia: Unless the if tests are ordered most to least likely, perhaps it would be better to use a switch/case and let the compiler decide. switch (signr) { case SIGBUS: return "bus error"; case SIGFPE: return "floating point exception"; case SIGILL: return "illegal instruction"; case SIGSEGV: return "segfault"; case SIGTRAP: return "unhandled trap"; } return "unknown signal"; }
Hi, Joe, Christophe. That's a nice enhancement. I'll do that in my next respin. Cheers Murilo