Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] powerpc/traps: Print signal name for unhandled signals
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: 2018-08-01 07:03:59
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 08:37 +0200, Christophe LEROY wrote:
Le 31/07/2018 à 16:50, Murilo Opsfelder Araujo a écrit :quoted
This adds a human-readable name in the unhandled signal message. Before this patch, a page fault looked like: pandafault[6303]: unhandled signal 11 at 100007d0 nip 1000061c lr 7fff93c55100 code 2 in pandafault[10000000+10000] After this patch, a page fault looks like: pandafault[6352]: segfault (11) at 13a2a09f8 nip 13a2a086c lr 7fffb63e5100 code 2 in pandafault[13a2a0000+10000]
]]
quoted
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
[]
quoted
@@ -96,6 +96,41 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__debugger_fault_handler); #define TM_DEBUG(x...) do { } while(0) #endif +static const char *signames[SIGRTMIN + 1] = { + "UNKNOWN", + "SIGHUP", // 1 + "SIGINT", // 2
[]
I don't think is is worth having that full table when we only use a few of them. (As discussed in v1 https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/948802/) I would suggest to instead use a function like this: static const char *signame(int signr) { if (signr == SIGBUS) return "bus error"; if (signr == SIGFPE) return "floating point exception"; if (signr == SIGILL) return "illegal instruction"; if (signr == SIGILL) return "segfault"; if (signr == SIGTRAP) return "unhandled trap"; return "unknown signal"; }
trivia:
Unless the if tests are ordered most to least likely,
perhaps it would be better to use a switch/case and
let the compiler decide.
switch (signr) {
case SIGBUS: return "bus error";
case SIGFPE: return "floating point exception";
case SIGILL: return "illegal instruction";
case SIGSEGV: return "segfault";
case SIGTRAP: return "unhandled trap";
}
return "unknown signal";
}