Re: RFC on writel and writel_relaxed
From: Sinan Kaya <hidden>
Date: 2018-04-02 13:01:44
Also in:
linux-rdma, netdev
On 3/29/2018 9:40 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2018-03-29 at 09:56 -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:quoted
On 3/28/2018 11:55 AM, David Miller wrote:quoted
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 02:13:16 +1100quoted
Let's fix all archs, it's way easier than fixing all drivers. Half of the archs are unused or dead anyway.Agreed.I pinged most of the maintainers yesterday. Which arches do we care about these days? I have not been paying attention any other architecture besides arm64.Thanks for going through that exercise ! Once sparc, s390, microblaze and mips reply, I think we'll have a good coverage, maybe riscv is to put in that lot too.
I posted the following two patches for supporting microblaze and unicore32. [PATCH v2 1/2] io: prevent compiler reordering on the default writeX() implementation [PATCH v2 2/2] io: prevent compiler reordering on the default readX() implementation The rest of the arches except mips and alpha seem OK. I sent a question email on Friday to mips and alpha mailing lists. I'll follow up with an actual patch today. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.