Re: RFC on writel and writel_relaxed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Date: 2018-03-26 16:54:32
Also in:
linux-rdma
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Date: 2018-03-26 16:54:32
Also in:
linux-rdma
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:08:45AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
quoted
quoted
This is a super performance critical operation for most drivers and directly impacts network performance.Perhaps there ought to be writel_nobarrier() (etc) that never contain any barriers at all. This might mean that they are always just the memory operation, but it would make it more obvious what the driver was doing.
I think that is what writel_relaxed is supposed to be. The only restriction it has is that the writes to a single device using UC memory must be kept in program order.. Jason