On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 07:23:45AM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:29:33 +0100
Aaron Tomlin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 02:26:54AM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
quoted
And has this been tested on parisc and metag, which use STACK_GROWSUP ?
I can't see how end_of_stack() as it's defined now could work on those archs.
AFAIU, dup_task_struct() has always done this explicitly.
I see no reason why init_task requires special attention.
I guess what I'm saying is, I can't see how the stack canary could have ever
detected any problems on parisc and metag. How did you test your patches on x86?
Yes - under x86 only.
Maybe someone could run tests on those other archs.
As I said, I can't see why it wouldn't work given
dup_task_struct()'s behaviour.
--
Aaron Tomlin