On 07/30/2013 09:13:28 PM, Liu Po-B43644 wrote:

=20

quoted

 -----Original Message-----
 From: Wood Scott-B07421
 Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 2:28 AM
 To: Liu Po-B43644
 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; galak@kernel.crashing.org; Fleming =20

Andy-

quoted

 AFLEMING; Hu Mingkai-B21284; Liu Po-B43644
 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/85xx: Add silicon device tree =20

for

quoted

 C293

 On 07/30/2013 03:49:22 AM, Po Liu wrote:
 > +	crypto@80000 {
 > +/include/ "qoriq-sec6.0-0.dtsi"
 > +	};
 > +
 > +	crypto@80000 {
 > +		reg =3D <0x80000 0x20000>;
 > +		ranges =3D <0x0 0x80000 0x20000>;
 > +
 > +		jr@1000{
 > +			interrupts =3D <45 2 0 0>;
 > +		};
 > +		jr@2000{
 > +			interrupts =3D <57 2 0 0>;
 > +		};
 > +	};

 Do these inline the way the example shows.

Sorry, Scott, I just remember in this way, the node can't be =20
recognized by system when run Uboot. The include can't be in the =20
crypto@80000. See the discussion in =20
http://git.am.freescale.net:8181/#/c/736/  .
Maybe I should re-modify the example file.

git.am.freescale.net is not accessible outside of Freescale; don't =20
reference it on external lists.  In any case, I don't know what =20
specifically you want me to look at there.  Just put the explanation =20
here.

I do not expect the dtc output to be any different between the two =20
methods.  Could you check this (by using dtc to decompile the dtb =20
afterward) and point out exactly how the output differs between the two =20
approaches?

-Scott=