Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip

On 12/19/2011 12:38 PM, Scott Wood wrote:

On 12/17/2011 08:35 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:

quoted

It looks like currently you can re-define chip->read_page, so I guess
you should rework MTD and make chip->write_page re-definable?

Unless something has changed very recently, there is no chip->read_page
or chip->write_page.  There is chip->ecc.read_page and
chip->ecc.write_page, but they are too low-level.  What we'd need to
replace is a portion of nand_do_read_ops()/nand_do_write_ops().

Sorry, chip->write_page does exist -- it's chip->read_page that would
need to be made similarly redefinable.

-Scott