Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd/nand : workaround for Freescale FCM to support large-page Nand chip
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Date: 2011-12-06 11:49:29
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 13:46 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
Because this is a controller resource, shared by multiple NAND chips that may be different page sizes (even if not, it's adding another point of synchronization required between initialization of different chips). I don't think it's worth the gymnastics to save a few KiB.
OK, I see. Artem.