Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 5 authors, 2009-12-14

Re: spi_mpc8xxx.c: chip select polarity problem

From: Anton Vorontsov <hidden>
Date: 2009-11-18 23:29:25

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 05:20:06PM +0100, Torsten Fleischer wrote:
[...]
quoted
Oh. On the other hand, we can postpone the gpio_direction_output()
call, and still require that the platform code (or firmware)
should be responsible for setting a sane default values on the
chip selects.
How about that?
Looks great, thanks!

Few minor issues below.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff -u -r -N linux-2.6.31.6_orig//drivers/spi/spi_mpc8xxx.c linux-2.6.31.6/drivers/spi/spi_mpc8xxx.c
--- linux-2.6.31.6_orig//drivers/spi/spi_mpc8xxx.c	2009-11-10 01:32:31.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.31.6/drivers/spi/spi_mpc8xxx.c	2009-11-18 10:47:06.000000000 +0100
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@
 	u32 rx_shift;		/* RX data reg shift when in qe mode */
 	u32 tx_shift;		/* TX data reg shift when in qe mode */
 	u32 hw_mode;		/* Holds HW mode register settings */
+	int initialized;
 };
 
 static inline void mpc8xxx_spi_write_reg(__be32 __iomem *reg, u32 val)
@@ -437,6 +438,7 @@
 		cs = kzalloc(sizeof *cs, GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!cs)
 			return -ENOMEM;
+		cs->initialized = 0;
No need for this, we allocated cs with kzalloc, which zeroes
the memory anyway.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 		spi->controller_state = cs;
 	}
 	mpc8xxx_spi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
@@ -503,15 +505,25 @@
 
 	return ret;
 }
+
+static void mpc8xxx_spi_cs_init(struct spi_device *spi);
+
+
Whenever possible, please avoid forward declarations.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 static int mpc8xxx_spi_transfer(struct spi_device *spi,
 				struct spi_message *m)
 {
 	struct mpc8xxx_spi *mpc8xxx_spi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
+	struct spi_mpc8xxx_cs *cs = spi->controller_state;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	m->actual_length = 0;
 	m->status = -EINPROGRESS;
 
+	if (cs && !cs->initialized) {
+		mpc8xxx_spi_cs_init(spi);
+		cs->initialized = 1;
+	}
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&mpc8xxx_spi->lock, flags);
 	list_add_tail(&m->queue, &mpc8xxx_spi->queue);
 	queue_work(mpc8xxx_spi->workqueue, &mpc8xxx_spi->work);
@@ -671,6 +683,17 @@
 	gpio_set_value(gpio, on ^ alow);
 }
 
+static void mpc8xxx_spi_cs_init(struct spi_device *spi)
+{
+	struct device *dev = spi->dev.parent;
+	struct mpc8xxx_spi_probe_info *pinfo = to_of_pinfo(dev->platform_data);
+	u16 cs = spi->chip_select;
+	int gpio = pinfo->gpios[cs];
+	bool on = (pinfo->alow_flags[cs] ^ !(spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH));
The outermost parenthesis aren't needed.
+
+	gpio_direction_output(gpio, on);
gpio_direction_output() may fail, so spi_cs_init too.

I'd write it as 'return gpio_direction_outpit(..)', and in
mpc8xxx_spi_transfer something like this:

	if (cs && !cs->initialized) {
		int ret;

		ret = mpc8xxx_spi_cs_init(spi);
		if (ret) {
			dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "cs_init failed: %d\n", ret);
			return ret;
		}
		cs->initialized = 1;
	}


Thanks!

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help