Re: MMIO and gcc re-ordering issue
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2008-05-30 07:25:50
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2008-05-30 07:25:50
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 08:07 +0200, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2008 11:13:23 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
Currently, this is the only interface I know that can do native-endian accesses, so if you take it away, I'm gonna need an alternative interface that doesn't do byteswapping.Are you aware that these also don't provide any ordering guarantee ?Yes, but I am not aware of any alternative. I think the drivers I've written have the necessary barriers (or dma ops with implicit barriers) that they don't actually depend on any DMA vs. MMIO ordering guarantees. I hope MMIO vs. MMIO ordering is guaranteed though?
Only to the same address I'd say. Ben.