Re: MMIO and gcc re-ordering issue
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2008-05-27 02:28:28
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2008-05-27 02:28:28
Also in:
linux-arch, lkml
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 12:15:40 +1000
Some of them. USB comes to mind. I'd be happy to make it "the rule" and document that MMIO vs. coherent access aren't implicitely ordered. I would still keep them ordered on powerpc for a little while tho until I'm happy enough with driver auditing. But heh, it's you who was telling me that it would be a bad engineering decision and we had to make everybody look like x86 & fully ordered :-) I decided to agree back then and stuck all those nasty heavy barriers in the powerpc variants of readl/writel/...
I still believe this. It's just another complicated thing for driver authors to get wrong. The other side of the coin is of course the cost. The only thing I am absolutely sure of is that we should make a decision fast, document it, and just stick to it.