Thread (101 messages) 101 messages, 19 authors, 2008-06-12

Re: MMIO and gcc re-ordering issue

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2008-05-27 02:28:28
Also in: linux-arch, lkml

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 12:15:40 +1000
Some of them. USB comes to mind. I'd be happy to make it "the rule" and
document that MMIO vs. coherent access aren't implicitely ordered. I
would still keep them ordered on powerpc for a little while tho until
I'm happy enough with driver auditing.

But heh, it's you who was telling me that it would be a bad engineering
decision and we had to make everybody look like x86 & fully ordered :-)
I decided to agree back then and stuck all those nasty heavy barriers
in the powerpc variants of readl/writel/...
I still believe this.

It's just another complicated thing for driver authors to get wrong.
The other side of the coin is of course the cost.

The only thing I am absolutely sure of is that we should make a
decision fast, document it, and just stick to it.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help