Re: [PATCH] fix missing option in binutils version check
From: Stef Simoens <hidden>
Date: 2004-07-04 01:30:47
Olaf Hering wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, Tom Rini wrote:quoted
And yes, passing -many does work on all older supported versions of binutils. So perhaps we should just add -Wa,-many to our cflags and be done with it now (and for future fixes of this sort).gcc 3.2 passes only -mppc, so all altive instructions will fail to compile without either -many or -maltivec
Are there altivec instructions when CONFIG_ALTIVEC is not set?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff -purNX /suse/olh/kernel/kernel_exclude.txt linux-2.6.7-bk16.orig/arch/ppc/kernel/Makefile linux-2.6.7-bk16/arch/ppc/kernel/Makefile--- linux-2.6.7-bk16.orig/arch/ppc/kernel/Makefile 2004-07-03 22:33:35.000000000 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.7-bk16/arch/ppc/kernel/Makefile 2004-07-03 22:51:16.802332774 +0200@@ -8,6 +8,9 @@ endif ifdef CONFIG_4xx EXTRA_AFLAGS := -Wa,-m405 endif +ifdef CONFIG_6xx +EXTRA_AFLAGS := -Wa,-maltivec +endif ifdef CONFIG_E500 EXTRA_AFLAGS := -Wa,-me500 endif
So, shouldn't this be "ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC" ? Stef ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/