Thread (48 messages) 48 messages, 7 authors, 2004-07-26

Re: [PATCH] fix typo in binutils version check

flat view

From: Tom Rini <hidden>
Date: 2004-06-07 15:57:02

On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 01:11:35PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
 On Sat, Jun 05, Christian Kujau wrote:
quoted
Olaf Hering wrote:
| The binutils check is bogus, it doesnt work with the just released
| binutils.

why is this check bogus then? i tried to compile a kernel with some
recent binutils which didn't pass the test - compilation failed.
H.J.Lu's binutils [1] are working quite well, the releases from redhat
[2] seem to produce these results you wrote about.
The checkbin target fails with current binutils cvs, you need an
additional option like -many
IMHO, binutils CVS is broken, and -many shouldn't be needed.  But that's
not the direction things are heading apparently.

But I believe that when Paul talked about this with some of the binutils
folks it was decided that we should add -many to the AFLAGS so the
kernel won't have to care about this.  So can you add -many to the
AFLAGS, and make the binutils check use $(AFLAGS) as well?  Thanks.

--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help