Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] ima: uncompressed module appraisal support
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2020-02-07 18:28:58
Also in:
linux-integrity, lkml
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2020-02-07 18:28:58
Also in:
linux-integrity, lkml
On Fri, 2020-02-07 at 10:49 -0700, Eric Snowberg wrote:
quoted
On Feb 7, 2020, at 10:40 AM, Mimi Zohar [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
$ insmod ./foo.ko insmod: ERROR: could not insert module ./foo.ko: Permission denied last entry from audit log: type=INTEGRITY_DATA msg=audit(1581089373.076:83): pid=2874 uid=0 auid=0 ses=1 subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0- s0:c0.c1023 op=appraise_data cause=invalid-signature comm="insmod" name="/root/keys/modules/foo.ko" dev="dm-0" ino=10918365 res=0^]UID="root" AUID=“root" This is because modsig_verify() will be called from within ima_appraise_measurement(), since try_modsig is true. Then modsig_verify() will return INTEGRITY_FAIL.Why is it an "invalid signature"? For that you need to look at the kernel messages. Most likely it can't find the public key on the .ima keyring to verify the signature.It is invalid because the module has not been ima signed.
With the IMA policy rule "appraise func=MODULE_CHECK appraise_type=imasig|modsig", IMA first tries to verify the IMA signature stored as an xattr and on failure then attempts to verify the appended signatures. The audit message above indicates that there was a signature, but the signature validation failed. Mimi