On Feb 11, 2019, at 11:10 AM, Borislav Petkov [off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:09:25AM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote:

quoted

It is just that I find the use of static_cpu_has()/boot_cpu_has() to be very
inconsistent. I doubt that show_cpuinfo_misc(), copy_fpstate_to_sigframe(),
or i915_memcpy_init_early() that use static_cpu_has() are any hotter than
text_poke_early().

Would some beefing of the comment over it help?

Is there any comment over static_cpu_has()? ;-)

Anyhow, obviously a comment would be useful.