Thread (71 messages) 71 messages, 8 authors, 2019-03-07

Re: [PATCH v2 10/20] x86: avoid W^X being broken during modules loading

From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date: 2019-02-11 19:11:08
Also in: linux-integrity, linux-mm, lkml

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:09:25AM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote:
It is just that I find the use of static_cpu_has()/boot_cpu_has() to be very
inconsistent. I doubt that show_cpuinfo_misc(), copy_fpstate_to_sigframe(),
or i915_memcpy_init_early() that use static_cpu_has() are any hotter than
text_poke_early().
Would some beefing of the comment over it help?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help