Re: [PATCH v2 10/20] x86: avoid W^X being broken during modules loading
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date: 2019-02-11 19:11:08
Also in:
linux-integrity, linux-mm, lkml
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date: 2019-02-11 19:11:08
Also in:
linux-integrity, linux-mm, lkml
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:09:25AM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote:
It is just that I find the use of static_cpu_has()/boot_cpu_has() to be very inconsistent. I doubt that show_cpuinfo_misc(), copy_fpstate_to_sigframe(), or i915_memcpy_init_early() that use static_cpu_has() are any hotter than text_poke_early().
Would some beefing of the comment over it help?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.