Re: [PATCH v2 10/20] x86: avoid W^X being broken during modules loading
From: Nadav Amit <hidden>
Date: 2019-02-11 19:09:36
Also in:
linux-integrity, linux-mm, lkml
From: Nadav Amit <hidden>
Date: 2019-02-11 19:09:36
Also in:
linux-integrity, linux-mm, lkml
On Feb 11, 2019, at 11:01 AM, Borislav Petkov [off-list ref] wrote: On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:45:26AM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote:quoted
Are you sure about that? This path is still used when modules are loaded.Yes, I'm sure. Loading a module does a gazillion things so saving a couple of insns - yes, boot_cpu_has() is usually a RIP-relative MOV and a TEST - doesn't show even as a blip on any radar.
I fully agree, if that is the standard. It is just that I find the use of static_cpu_has()/boot_cpu_has() to be very inconsistent. I doubt that show_cpuinfo_misc(), copy_fpstate_to_sigframe(), or i915_memcpy_init_early() that use static_cpu_has() are any hotter than text_poke_early(). Anyhow, I’ll use boot_cpu_has() as you said.