[PATCH v5 next 1/5] modules:capabilities: add request_module_cap()
From: Michal Kubecek <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-29 07:50:01
Also in:
lkml, netdev
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:48:49PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:18:18PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:quoted
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 01:39:58PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:quoted
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
And *all* auto-loading uses aliases? What's the difference between auto-loading and direct-loading?The difference is the process privileges. Unprivilged autoloading (e.g. int n_hdlc = N_HDLC; ioctl(fd, TIOCSETD, &n_hdlc)), triggers a privileged call to finit_module() under CAP_SYS_MODULE.Ah, so system call implicated request_module() calls.Yup. Unprivileged user does something that ultimately hits a request_module() in the kernel. Then the kernel calls out with the usermode helper (which has CAP_SYS_MODULE) and calls finit_module().Thanks, using this terminology is much better to understand than auto-loading, given it does make it clear an unprivileged call was one that initiated the request_module() call, there are many uses of request_module() which *are* privileged.quoted
quoted
OK and since CAP_SYS_MODULE is much more restrictive one could argue, what's the point here?The goal is to block an unprivileged user from being able to trigger a module load without blocking root from loading modules directly.I see now. Do we have an audit of all system calls which implicate a request_module() call? Networking is a good example for sure to start off with but I was curious if we have a grasp of how wide spread this could be.
I'm not sure it makes sense to classify this by syscalls. In networking, request_module() can be triggered e.g. by a netlink message (genetlink family lookup is an example not needing any privileges) so that one of the syscalls would be sendmsg(). Michal Kubecek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html