Thread (83 messages) flat view 83 messages, 14 authors, 2017-12-01

[PATCH v5 next 1/5] modules:capabilities: add request_module_cap()

From: Djalal Harouni <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-28 21:33:32
Also in: lkml, netdev

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:11:34PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
kmod is just a helper to poke userpsace to load a module, that's it.

The old init_module() and newer finit_module() do the real handy work or
module loading, and both currently only use may_init_module():

static int may_init_module(void)
{
        if (!capable(CAP_SYS_MODULE) || modules_disabled)
                return -EPERM;

        return 0;
}

This begs the question:

  o If userspace just tries to just use raw finit_module() do we want similar
    checks?

Otherwise, correct me if I'm wrong this all seems pointless.
Hm? That's direct-loading, not auto-loading. This series is only about
auto-loading.
And *all* auto-loading uses aliases? What's the difference between auto-loading
and direct-loading?
Not all auto-loading uses aliases, auto-loading is when kernel code
calls request_module() to loads the feature that was not present, and
direct-loading in this thread is the direct syscalls like
finit_module().
quoted
We already have a global sysctl for blocking direct-loading (modules_disabled).
My point was that even if you have a CAP_NET_ADMIN check on request_module(),
finit_module() will not check for it, so a crafty userspace could still try
to just finit_module() directly, and completely then bypass the CAP_NET_ADMIN
check.
The finit_module() uses CAP_SYS_MODULE which should allow all modules
and in this context it should be more privileged than CAP_NET_ADMIN
which is only for "netdev-%s" (to not load arbitrary modules with it).

finit_module() coming from request_module() always has the
CAP_NET_ADMIN, hence the check is done before.
So unless I'm missing something, I see no point in adding extra checks for
request_module() but nothing for the respective load_module().
I see, request_module() is called from kernel context which runs in
init namespace will full capabilities, the spawned userspace modprobe
will get CAP_SYS_MODULE and all other caps, then after comes modprobe
and load_module().

Btw as suggested by Linus I will update with request_module_cap() and
I can offer my help maintaining these bits too.

  Luis


-- 
tixxdz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help