Dear Paul,

On 29.03.21 23:16, Paul Menzel wrote:

[Resent from correct address.]

Am 29.03.21 um 23:15 schrieb Paul Menzel:

quoted

Dear Linüx folks,


Am 10.02.21 um 17:29 schrieb Don.Brace@microchip.com:

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: John Garry [mailto:john.garry@huawei.com]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 15/25] smartpqi: fix host qdepth limit

quoted

I think that this can alternatively be solved by setting .host_tagset flag.

Thanks,
John

Don: John, can I add a Suggested-by tag for you for my new patch smartpqi-use-host-wide-tagspace?

I don't mind. And I think that Ming had the same idea.

quoted

Don: Thanks for reminding me. Ming, can I add your Suggested-by tag?

It looks like, iterations 4 and 5 of the patch series have been posted in the meantime. Unfortunately without the reporters and discussion participants in Cc. Linux upstream is still broken since version 5.5.

When "smartpqi: use host wide tagspace" [1] goes into mainline, we can submit it to stable, if nobody else does. This fixes the original problem and we got a patch with the same code change running in our 5.10 kernels.

Best
   Donald

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/161549369787.25025.8975999483518581619.stgit@brunhilda/ (local)

quoted

Kind regards,

Paul


[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/161540568064.19430.11157730901022265360.stgit@brunhilda/ (local)
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/161549045434.25025.17473629602756431540.stgit@brunhilda/ (local)