Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 5 authors, 2011-02-21

Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf events: add timehist option to record and report

From: Frederic Weisbecker <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-18 19:30:30
Also in: lkml

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 04:41:19PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:59:30PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker escreveu:
quoted
  sched:sched_wait_task                      [Tracepoint event]
  sched:sched_wakeup                         [Tracepoint event]
  sched:sched_wakeup_new                     [Tracepoint event]
  sched:sched_switch                         [Tracepoint event]
  sched:sched_migrate_task                   [Tracepoint event]
  sched:sched_process_free                   [Tracepoint event]
  sched:sched_process_exit                   [Tracepoint event]


You have the sched:sched_switch event and many others.

Just try:

perf record -a -e sched:*
perf script

            perf-4128  [000] 19242.870025: sched_stat_runtime: comm=perf pid=4128 runtime=7430405 [ns] vruntime=3530192223488 
            perf-4128  [000] 19242.870042: sched_stat_runtime: comm=perf pid=4128 runtime=23142 [ns] vruntime=3530192246630 [n
            perf-4128  [000] 19242.870045: sched_stat_sleep: comm=kondemand/0 pid=59 delay=9979163 [ns]
            perf-4128  [000] 19242.870048: sched_wakeup: comm=kondemand/0 pid=59 prio=120 success=1 target_cpu=000
            perf-4128  [000] 19242.870063: sched_stat_runtime: comm=perf pid=4128 runtime=21581 [ns] vruntime=3530192268211 [n
            perf-4128  [000] 19242.870066: sched_stat_wait: comm=kondemand/0 pid=59 delay=21581 [ns]
            perf-4128  [000] 19242.870069: sched_switch: prev_comm=perf prev_pid=4128 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> next_comm
     kondemand/0-59    [000] 19242.870091: sched_stat_runtime: comm=kondemand/0 pid=59 runtime=27362 [ns] vruntime=35301862739
     kondemand/0-59    [000] 19242.870094: sched_stat_wait: comm=perf pid=4128 delay=27362 [ns]
     kondemand/0-59    [000] 19242.870095: sched_switch: prev_comm=kondemand/0 prev_pid=59 prev_prio=120 prev_state=S ==> next

And you can run your own script on these events:

$ sudo ./perf script -g python
generated Python script: perf-script.py

Edit perf-script.py and then run it:

$ perf script -s ./perf-script.py

That also works for perl.

The timestamps will be the cpu time and not the walltime, but at least that seems
to be partly what you seek?
The whole issue for him, AFAIK, is to correlate perf events with app
events.

Think about tcpdump + networking tracepoints or 'perf probe' dynamic
events in the network stack, he wants to merge those logs and correlate
the tcpdump packet exchange with the tracepoints events in the network
stack, etc.

I.e. it doesn't matter if it is ftrace or not, having a common clock
shared between apps and kernel tracing/whatever infrastructure is what
David is after, right?

He can change userspace to use the clock the kernel is using in the
perf/ftrace/whatever infrastructure or make the kernel use the clock
userspace uses.

The issue here is who will bend, u or k ;-)
Right. I don't disagree with the need of a walltime. That already
in debate :)

I was rather arguing about the tracing part. Adding support in perf report
in the wrong way to do this. If something must be extended, It should be done
in perf script, where we do the tracing support.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help