Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf events: add timehist option to record and report
From: Frederic Weisbecker <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-18 19:30:30
Also in:
linux-perf-users
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 04:41:19PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:59:30PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker escreveu:quoted
sched:sched_wait_task [Tracepoint event] sched:sched_wakeup [Tracepoint event] sched:sched_wakeup_new [Tracepoint event] sched:sched_switch [Tracepoint event] sched:sched_migrate_task [Tracepoint event] sched:sched_process_free [Tracepoint event] sched:sched_process_exit [Tracepoint event] You have the sched:sched_switch event and many others. Just try: perf record -a -e sched:* perf script perf-4128 [000] 19242.870025: sched_stat_runtime: comm=perf pid=4128 runtime=7430405 [ns] vruntime=3530192223488 perf-4128 [000] 19242.870042: sched_stat_runtime: comm=perf pid=4128 runtime=23142 [ns] vruntime=3530192246630 [n perf-4128 [000] 19242.870045: sched_stat_sleep: comm=kondemand/0 pid=59 delay=9979163 [ns] perf-4128 [000] 19242.870048: sched_wakeup: comm=kondemand/0 pid=59 prio=120 success=1 target_cpu=000 perf-4128 [000] 19242.870063: sched_stat_runtime: comm=perf pid=4128 runtime=21581 [ns] vruntime=3530192268211 [n perf-4128 [000] 19242.870066: sched_stat_wait: comm=kondemand/0 pid=59 delay=21581 [ns] perf-4128 [000] 19242.870069: sched_switch: prev_comm=perf prev_pid=4128 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> next_comm kondemand/0-59 [000] 19242.870091: sched_stat_runtime: comm=kondemand/0 pid=59 runtime=27362 [ns] vruntime=35301862739 kondemand/0-59 [000] 19242.870094: sched_stat_wait: comm=perf pid=4128 delay=27362 [ns] kondemand/0-59 [000] 19242.870095: sched_switch: prev_comm=kondemand/0 prev_pid=59 prev_prio=120 prev_state=S ==> next And you can run your own script on these events: $ sudo ./perf script -g python generated Python script: perf-script.py Edit perf-script.py and then run it: $ perf script -s ./perf-script.py That also works for perl. The timestamps will be the cpu time and not the walltime, but at least that seems to be partly what you seek?The whole issue for him, AFAIK, is to correlate perf events with app events. Think about tcpdump + networking tracepoints or 'perf probe' dynamic events in the network stack, he wants to merge those logs and correlate the tcpdump packet exchange with the tracepoints events in the network stack, etc. I.e. it doesn't matter if it is ftrace or not, having a common clock shared between apps and kernel tracing/whatever infrastructure is what David is after, right? He can change userspace to use the clock the kernel is using in the perf/ftrace/whatever infrastructure or make the kernel use the clock userspace uses. The issue here is who will bend, u or k ;-)
Right. I don't disagree with the need of a walltime. That already in debate :) I was rather arguing about the tracing part. Adding support in perf report in the wrong way to do this. If something must be extended, It should be done in perf script, where we do the tracing support.