Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf events: add timehist option to record and report
flat view
From: David Ahern <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-18 18:48:00
Also in:
lkml
On 02/18/11 11:41, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:59:30PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker escreveu:quoted
sched:sched_wait_task [Tracepoint event] sched:sched_wakeup [Tracepoint event] sched:sched_wakeup_new [Tracepoint event] sched:sched_switch [Tracepoint event] sched:sched_migrate_task [Tracepoint event] sched:sched_process_free [Tracepoint event] sched:sched_process_exit [Tracepoint event] You have the sched:sched_switch event and many others. Just try: perf record -a -e sched:* perf script perf-4128 [000] 19242.870025: sched_stat_runtime: comm=perf pid=4128 runtime=7430405 [ns] vruntime=3530192223488 perf-4128 [000] 19242.870042: sched_stat_runtime: comm=perf pid=4128 runtime=23142 [ns] vruntime=3530192246630 [n perf-4128 [000] 19242.870045: sched_stat_sleep: comm=kondemand/0 pid=59 delay=9979163 [ns] perf-4128 [000] 19242.870048: sched_wakeup: comm=kondemand/0 pid=59 prio=120 success=1 target_cpu=000 perf-4128 [000] 19242.870063: sched_stat_runtime: comm=perf pid=4128 runtime=21581 [ns] vruntime=3530192268211 [n perf-4128 [000] 19242.870066: sched_stat_wait: comm=kondemand/0 pid=59 delay=21581 [ns] perf-4128 [000] 19242.870069: sched_switch: prev_comm=perf prev_pid=4128 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> next_comm kondemand/0-59 [000] 19242.870091: sched_stat_runtime: comm=kondemand/0 pid=59 runtime=27362 [ns] vruntime=35301862739 kondemand/0-59 [000] 19242.870094: sched_stat_wait: comm=perf pid=4128 delay=27362 [ns] kondemand/0-59 [000] 19242.870095: sched_switch: prev_comm=kondemand/0 prev_pid=59 prev_prio=120 prev_state=S ==> next And you can run your own script on these events: $ sudo ./perf script -g python generated Python script: perf-script.py Edit perf-script.py and then run it: $ perf script -s ./perf-script.py That also works for perl. The timestamps will be the cpu time and not the walltime, but at least that seems to be partly what you seek?The whole issue for him, AFAIK, is to correlate perf events with app events. Think about tcpdump + networking tracepoints or 'perf probe' dynamic events in the network stack, he wants to merge those logs and correlate the tcpdump packet exchange with the tracepoints events in the network stack, etc. I.e. it doesn't matter if it is ftrace or not, having a common clock shared between apps and kernel tracing/whatever infrastructure is what David is after, right?
A means of correlating the two, yes.
He can change userspace to use the clock the kernel is using in the perf/ftrace/whatever infrastructure or make the kernel use the clock userspace uses. The issue here is who will bend, u or k ;-)
It makes sense for ftrace, perf, etc to use a monotonic clock. That timestamp is nonsense to users (just a string of numbers) and application writers like those pretty little strings that relate to time has humans acknowledge it. David
- Arnaldo