On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 15:04 -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 04:01:31PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
quoted
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 12:53 -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
quoted
quoted
So size should be changed to u64 rather than modifying the
WARN_ON_ONCE?
Yeah, I guess so, 32-bit has to die it seems, gets in the way of
testing
:-)
No!
1) don't use RAW unless you have to
2) you don't have to, goto 1
3) if you do anyway, ensure its properly padded
Ok, but using that struct definition on 32-bit land, will lead to non 8 byte
alignment, right?
Nope, its just fine.. it defaults to an empty 4byte payload ;-)
Its just that any custom payload must be of size 4+8*n bytes.