Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 5 authors, 2011-01-17

Re: perf timechart broken

From: Thomas Renninger <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-17 10:50:10
Also in: lkml

On Friday 14 January 2011 18:09:05 David Ahern wrote:
On 01/14/11 10:00, Thomas Renninger wrote:
quoted
quoted
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-perf-
users@vger.kernel.org/msg00057.html
Looks slightly different, the segfault should happen in:
process_sample_event
But looks very much related, possibly it has not been made/make with 
DEBUG=1
and -O6 was added and the backtrace is not 100% correct?
perf was built with DEBUG=1; that's how I got the pretty backtrace
versus having the arguments optimized out. The cpu=6291457 is the
garbage causing the segfault
Then it's the same issue.
(there are only 2 cores in the system).
6291457 = 0x600001. Perhaps a mask is missing?
No, the power_start and power_end event have different kernel
structures, but in builtin-timechart.c the same struct is used.
cpu is at the end.
Therefore pe->cpu_id (in power_end case) accesses uninitialized
data.

But using the cpu data from the event itself (data.cpu, the cpu on
which the event got emited) for fixing this is fine.
It's the way it was done before the bug got introduced.
As said, this won't work if the kernel code triggering the C-state
is executed on a different CPU than the CPU which is affected by
the C-state change. But such HW does not yet exist on X86 afaik and the
power_start event dies out anyway.

I resubmitted the fix for 2.6.3{6,7} stable kernels and added you
to CC.

   Thomas
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help