Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 5 authors, 2011-01-17

Re: perf timechart broken

From: Thomas Renninger <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-14 16:49:44
Also in: lkml

On Tuesday 11 January 2011 15:51:34 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:49:51AM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
quoted
Em Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:55:36AM +0100, Thomas Renninger escreveu:
quoted
On Tuesday 11 January 2011 02:36:28 Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
quoted
It's too late for .37, but it's fine, we just need to add
a "Cc: stable@kernel.org" tag in the patch for it to be
backported.
I'll submit it to stable@ (it wasn't taken because
the patch which included the fix wasn't mainline yet and I
forgot to submit it for 2.6.37-rcX). 
 
quoted
I can take care of that, but it would be great if someone could look
at the issue that perf timechart shows: "no trace data in the file" in
x86/tip which seems introduced by one of Arnaldo's latest commits.
Reverting some of his latest patches, solved it for me.
Looking at it now.
Can you try with this patch applied? We need a better way of specifying
ordering of __exit and __init routines :-\
I tested on x86/tip and it is fixed.
I explicitly reverted your fix and run into it again.

Thanks!

   Thomas
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help