On 01/14/11 10:00, Thomas Renninger wrote:

quoted

http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-perf-

users@vger.kernel.org/msg00057.html
Looks slightly different, the segfault should happen in:
process_sample_event
But looks very much related, possibly it has not been made/make with 
DEBUG=1
and -O6 was added and the backtrace is not 100% correct?

perf was built with DEBUG=1; that's how I got the pretty backtrace
versus having the arguments optimized out. The cpu=6291457 is the
garbage causing the segfault (there are only 2 cores in the system).
6291457 = 0x600001. Perhaps a mask is missing?

David

I still did not have time to send it out, will do so on Mo.

    Thomas