Em Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 05:49:36PM +0100, Thomas Renninger escreveu:

On Tuesday 11 January 2011 15:51:34 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:

quoted

Em Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:49:51AM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:

quoted

Looking at it now.

Can you try with this patch applied? We need a better way of specifying
ordering of __exit and __init routines :-\

I tested on x86/tip and it is fixed.
I explicitly reverted your fix and run into it again.

Thanks!

Thanks a lot for reporting and retesting,

- Arnaldo