On Thu 24-06-21 17:19:53, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 10:12:40AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 01:15:17PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
quoted
static struct mem_cgroup_per_node *
-mem_cgroup_page_nodeinfo(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct page *page)
+mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid)
{
- int nid = page_to_nid(page);
-
return memcg->nodeinfo[nid];
}
I'd just kill this function entirely and open code it into the only
caller
Done.
This makes sense.
quoted
quoted
- mctz = soft_limit_tree_from_page(page);
+ mctz = soft_limit_tree_node(nid);
And while were at it, soft_limit_tree_node seems like a completely
pointless helper that does nothing but obsfucating the code. While
you touch this area it might be worth to spin another patch to just
remove it as well.
Yeah, the whole soft limit reclaim code is kinda pain to even look at.
Opencoding those two will certainly not make it worse so fine with me.
I'm scared that if I touch this file too much, people will start to
think I know something about memcgs. Happy to add it on; cc'ing
maintainers.
get_maintainers will surely notice ;)
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs