Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] mm,memory_hotplug: Add kernel boot option to enable memmap_on_memory
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Date: 2021-03-24 09:03:49
Also in:
lkml
On Wed 24-03-21 09:45:01, Oscar Salvador wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:47:53AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:quoted
On Fri 19-03-21 10:26:33, Oscar Salvador wrote:quoted
Self stored memmap leads to a sparse memory situation which is unsuitable for workloads that requires large contiguous memory chunks, so make this an opt-in which needs to be explicitly enabled. To control this, let memory_hotplug have its own memory space, as suggested by David, so we can add memory_hotplug.memmap_on_memory parameter. Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <redacted>Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> I would just rephrased the help text to be less low level...quoted
When enabled, runtime hotplugged memory will allocate its internal metadata (struct pages) from the hotadded memory which will allow to hotadd a lot of memory without requiring additional memory to do so. This feature is disabled by default because it has some implication on large (e.g. GB) allocations in some configurations (e.g. small memory blocks).Ok, this sounds good as well, and I guess it might suit best for what admin-guide is about.quoted
The memmap_on_memory can be dropped from the 1st patch IIUC and only introduce it now.It could be done, and I __think__ in some previous persion it was that way, but I am leaning to not do it. In the 1st patch, memmap_on_memory is false by default, so I see it as a preparatory step for later (this patchset) till it might be enabled. Moreover, the big comment from mhp_support_memmap_on_memory() should change to not mention it, and change here again to reflect it. All in all, I think it can stay, but maybe place a comment in the 1st patch above the variable saying something like "This is a noop now, it will be enabled later on"
I will leave that up to you. This is likely not worth a larger discussion but it seems quite pointless to add a variable which never changes. The resulting code might look different than you expect because compiler is allowed to simply drop the whole condition.
quoted
quoted
+ +/* + * memory_hotplug.memmap_on_memory parameter + */ +static bool memmap_on_memory __ro_after_init; +#ifdef CONFIG_MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY +module_param(memmap_on_memory, bool, 0444); +MODULE_PARM_DESC(memmap_on_memory, "Enable memmap on memory for memory hotplug"); +#endifI am not very much familiar with the machinery. Does this expose the state to the userspace?Kind of: # ls /sys/module/memory_hotplug/parameters memmap_on_memory # cat /sys/module/memory_hotplug/parameters/memmap_on_memory Y But that is not really the state, but rather it shows whether the user opted-in the feature by passing "memory_hotplug.memmap_on_memory=yes". It might be that the user opted-in the feature, but it cannot be used at at runtime (e.g: mhp_support_memmap_on_memory() return false due to size != memory_block_size())
Thanks for the clarification. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs