On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 20:10 -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:

On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Rik van Riel wrote:

quoted

On 11/20/2012 08:54 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:

quoted

I can confirm single JVM JBB is working well for me.  I see a 30%
improvement over autoNUMA.  What I can't make sense of is some perf
stats (taken at 80 warehouses on 4 x WST-EX, 512GB memory):

AutoNUMA does not have native THP migration, that may explain some
of the difference.

When I made some fixes to the sched/numa native THP migration,
I did also try porting that (with Hannes's memcg fixes) to AutoNUMA.

Here's the patch below: it appeared to be working just fine, but
you might find that it doesn't quite apply to whatever tree you're
using.  I started from 3.6 autonuma28fast in aa.git, but had folded
in some of the equally applicable TLB flush optimizations too.

There's also a little "Hack, remove after THP native migration"
retuning in mm/huge_memory.c which should probably be removed too.

Thanks, this worked for me.  The autoNUMA SPECjbb result is now much
closer, just 4% lower than the numa/core result.  The number of anon and
anon-huge pages are now nearly the same.

-Andrew Theurer

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>