Thread (101 messages) 101 messages, 12 authors, 2012-11-28

Re: numa/core regressions fixed - more testers wanted

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Date: 2012-11-21 09:38:10
Also in: lkml

* David Rientjes [off-list ref] wrote:
I started profiling on a new machine that is an exact 
duplicate of the 16-way, 4 node, 32GB machine I was profiling 
with earlier to rule out any machine-specific problems.  I 
pulled master and ran new comparisons with THP enabled at 
c418de93e398 ("Merge branch 'x86/mm'"):

  CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING disabled	136521.55 SPECjbb2005 bops
  CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING enabled		132476.07 SPECjbb2005 bops (-3.0%)

Aside: neither 4739578c3ab3 ("x86/mm: Don't flush the TLB on 
#WP pmd fixups") nor 01e9c2441eee ("x86/vsyscall: Add Kconfig 
option to use native vsyscalls and switch to it") 
significantly improved upon the throughput on this system.
Could you please send an updated profile done with latest -tip? 
The last profile I got from you still had the vsyscall emulation 
page faults in it.

Thanks,

	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help