* Mel Gorman [off-list ref] wrote:

Ok.

In response to one of your later questions, I found that I had 
in fact disabled THP without properly reporting it. [...]

Hugepages is a must for most forms of NUMA/HPC. This alone 
questions the relevance of most of your prior numa/core testing 
results. I now have to strongly dispute your other conclusions 
as well.

Just a look at 'perf top' output should have told you the story.

Yet time and time again you readily reported bad 'schednuma' 
results for a slow 4K memory model that neither we nor other 
NUMA testers I talked to actually used, without stopping to look 
why that was so...

[ I suspect that if such terabytes-of-data workloads are forced 
  through such a slow 4K pages model then there's a bug or 
  mis-tuning in our code that explains the level of additional 
  slowdown you saw - we'll fix that.

  But you should know that behavior under the slow 4K model 
  tells very little about the true scheduling and placement 
  quality of the patches... ]

Please report proper THP-enabled numbers before continuing.

Thanks,

	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>