Thread (72 messages) 72 messages, 16 authors, 2020-07-22

Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH 14/35] i2c/busses: Change PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL to 0

From: Jean Delvare <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-17 14:58:24
Also in: linux-i2c, linux-pci, lkml

Hi Saheed,

On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:22:26 +0200, Saheed O. Bolarinwa wrote:
In reference to the PCI spec (Chapter 2), PCIBIOS* is an x86 concept.
Their scope should be limited within arch/x86.
Which PCI specification are you talking about here. In my "PCI Local
Bus Revision 2.3" specification (March 29, 2002), chapter 2 is about
Signal Definition and has nothing to do with the BIOS.
Change all PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL to 0

Signed-off-by: "Saheed O. Bolarinwa" <redacted>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ali15x3.c |  4 ++--
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nforce2.c |  2 +-
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sis5595.c | 10 +++++-----
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Hmmm. That seems to be a lot of changes to solve an essentially
theoretical problem (if a problem at all). I am not familiar enough
with the PCI subsystem to claim that it is fundamentally wrong, but
enough to say I'm skeptical.

PCI is a cross-architecture standard, and we can't possibly have the
return value of core functions such as pci_write_config_word follow
different conventions depending on the architecture, can we? Does
pci_write_config_word() currently return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL on success
on x86 and 0 on success on other architectures? What about errors, do
we return positive, "PCIBIOS-specific" error codes on x86 and negative,
unix-like error codes on other architectures?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ali15x3.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ali15x3.c
index 02185a1cfa77..359ee3e0864a 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ali15x3.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ali15x3.c
@@ -167,11 +167,11 @@ static int ali15x3_setup(struct pci_dev *ALI15X3_dev)
 	if(force_addr) {
 		dev_info(&ALI15X3_dev->dev, "forcing ISA address 0x%04X\n",
 			ali15x3_smba);
-		if (PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL != pci_write_config_word(ALI15X3_dev,
+		if (0 != pci_write_config_word(ALI15X3_dev,
 								SMBBA,
 								ali15x3_smba))
 			goto error;
This leaves the code horribly aligned.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-		if (PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL != pci_read_config_word(ALI15X3_dev,
+		if (0 != pci_read_config_word(ALI15X3_dev,
 								SMBBA, &a))
 			goto error;
 		if ((a & ~(ALI15X3_SMB_IOSIZE - 1)) != ali15x3_smba) {
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nforce2.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nforce2.c
index 777278386f58..385f4f446f36 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nforce2.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nforce2.c
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ static int nforce2_probe_smb(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar, int alt_reg,
 		u16 iobase;
 
 		if (pci_read_config_word(dev, alt_reg, &iobase)
-		    != PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL) {
+		    != 0) {
 			dev_err(&dev->dev, "Error reading PCI config for %s\n",
 				name);
 			return -EIO;
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sis5595.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sis5595.c
index c793a5c14cda..fbe3ee31eae3 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sis5595.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sis5595.c
@@ -176,10 +176,10 @@ static int sis5595_setup(struct pci_dev *SIS5595_dev)
 	if (force_addr) {
 		dev_info(&SIS5595_dev->dev, "forcing ISA address 0x%04X\n", sis5595_base);
 		if (pci_write_config_word(SIS5595_dev, ACPI_BASE, sis5595_base)
-		    != PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL)
+		    != 0)
 			goto error;
 		if (pci_read_config_word(SIS5595_dev, ACPI_BASE, &a)
-		    != PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL)
+		    != 0)
 			goto error;
 		if ((a & ~(SIS5595_EXTENT - 1)) != sis5595_base) {
 			/* doesn't work for some chips! */
@@ -189,15 +189,15 @@ static int sis5595_setup(struct pci_dev *SIS5595_dev)
 	}
 
 	if (pci_read_config_byte(SIS5595_dev, SIS5595_ENABLE_REG, &val)
-	    != PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL)
+	    != 0)
 		goto error;
 	if ((val & 0x80) == 0) {
 		dev_info(&SIS5595_dev->dev, "enabling ACPI\n");
 		if (pci_write_config_byte(SIS5595_dev, SIS5595_ENABLE_REG, val | 0x80)
-		    != PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL)
+		    != 0)
 			goto error;
 		if (pci_read_config_byte(SIS5595_dev, SIS5595_ENABLE_REG, &val)
-		    != PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL)
+		    != 0)
 			goto error;
 		if ((val & 0x80) == 0) {
 			/* doesn't work for some chips? */

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help