Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] hid: Introduce device groups
From: Benjamin Tissoires <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-03 14:04:39
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Henrik Rydberg [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
2) Add the interface type to the group descision, which should probably be done anyway. I have a patch in the pipe that, will send it later today.A simpler solution consists in adding the macros HID_USB_MT_DEVICE(v, p) and HID_BLUETOOTH_MT_DEVICE(v, p) as you had introduced in a earlier patch (I don't know why it disappeared).No, the specific entries in the hid-multitouch device list matches any group, so those defines were simplified away in the second version.disagree: a device can present several interface (because it has several "devices") and only those presenting Contact ID can and should be handled by hid-multitouch.Obviously this is only a problem for the devices with mixed interfaces, but for those, solution 2) together with specifying the group as you suggest should work. We can definitely change all devices in the list, it just was not necessary before (or so I thought).quoted
The think is that they do match hid-generic (they get the group HID_GROUP_GENERIC). However they also match hid-multitouch (as hid-multitouch does not ask for a particular group). So, if hid-multitouch is loaded __before__ hid-generic, it will be given the device whatever the match with hid-generic.I suppose what you describe here is how it was working before the device groups.
Just to be clear: no, this last paragraph occurs after device groups. Before, it was working as hid-generic catch the device first, then released it while looking at the report descriptors. Now, it's purely dependent on which driver is loaded first for this particaular case. Benjamin
Ok, I see what to do now. I will be back shortly with a patch which should make USB_DEVICE_ID_TOPSEED2_PERIPAD_701 work, and let's take it from there. Thanks for testing, Henrik