Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] hid: Introduce device groups
From: Jiri Kosina <hidden>
Date: 2012-04-30 11:55:53
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
quoted
quoted
Just got the stacktrace on [1] though when running kernel with this patchset. The trace popped during shutdown, and the machine froze completely; I didn't have any kind of external console connected, so unfortunately I don't have the beginning of the whole thing. I haven't been able to reproduce it so far. This was after several "parallel" plug/remove cycles of multiple HID devices driven by multiple different drivers. I haven't performed any analysis what this might be yet. [1] http://www.jikos.cz/jikos/junk/autoloading-trace.jpgIt actually seems to be spinlock lockup (due to the NMI trigger being apparent at the very first line) on kbd_event_lock ...Ah, yes. I take it you are talking about tty/vt/keyboard.c. So some random keypress during shutdown triggers the event, which eventually reaches input_pass_event(). From there on, the trace stays in the mentioned driver. First kbd_event() gets called, which takes the lock and goes on to, in turn, call kbd_keycode(), k_handler[2]() == k_spec(), fn_handler[9]() == fn_hold(), which goes on to call stop_tty(). This function comes back to the driver, via con_stop(), as vt_kbd_con_stop(), which in turn takes the same lock. So unless the teardown of something in hid affects the choices made in the tty driver, it appears this is a different problem. Or?
I just came to the same conclusion a few minutes ago ... i.e. this is likely unrelated to the patchset and I just triggered it by pure coincidence on the patched kernel. I will keep looking into it a little bit more. Dmitry, any immediate ideas by any chance? Otherwise the series seems indeed fine and if I don't come across anything substantial once I am done with the review, I am considering pushing it for -next (I still have to look at quirks propagation Nikolai pointed out). Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs