Re: [PATCHv9 1/3] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

From
Mark Brown <hidden>
Date
2012-11-22 19:12:30
Also in
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-pm, linux-tegra, lkml
Reply to
Alexandre Courbot, 2012-11-22
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:01:34AM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
The thing I don't understand here is why would anyone want power
sequences without the DT representation. Guys, that's the whole point! :)
If we are to implement things into drivers, then callback functions
are going to serve us just as well - even better, for they are more
flexible. All we need to do is define a dedicated ops structure and
have the driver plug the right callback functions depending on the
"compatible" property of the DT device node. We don't need a framework
for that.
It allows drivers (both board drivers and actual drivers) to write these
things in a semi-scripted form instead of having to open code everything
each time, it'd save a bunch of tedious stuff with resource requesting
for example.

Attachments

Thread (43 messages) 43 messages, 10 authors, last reply 2012-11-27
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help