[PATCHv9 1/3] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences
From: Mark Brown <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-22 19:12:30
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-fbdev, linux-pm, linux-tegra, lkml
From: Mark Brown <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-22 19:12:30
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-fbdev, linux-pm, linux-tegra, lkml
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:01:34AM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
The thing I don't understand here is why would anyone want power sequences without the DT representation. Guys, that's the whole point! :)
If we are to implement things into drivers, then callback functions are going to serve us just as well - even better, for they are more flexible. All we need to do is define a dedicated ops structure and have the driver plug the right callback functions depending on the "compatible" property of the DT device node. We don't need a framework for that.
It allows drivers (both board drivers and actual drivers) to write these things in a semi-scripted form instead of having to open code everything each time, it'd save a bunch of tedious stuff with resource requesting for example. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20121122/a77bf97c/attachment.sig>