On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Mark Brown
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:01:34AM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:

quoted

The thing I don't understand here is why would anyone want power
sequences without the DT representation. Guys, that's the whole point! :)

quoted

If we are to implement things into drivers, then callback functions
are going to serve us just as well - even better, for they are more
flexible. All we need to do is define a dedicated ops structure and
have the driver plug the right callback functions depending on the
"compatible" property of the DT device node. We don't need a framework
for that.

It allows drivers (both board drivers and actual drivers) to write these
things in a semi-scripted form instead of having to open code everything
each time, it'd save a bunch of tedious stuff with resource requesting
for example.

Mmm, I overlooked that point - that's fair enough. Guess I should
remove all DT support and stress that point in the documentation. Then
maybe we'll have a deal.

Alex.