Thread (111 messages) 111 messages, 9 authors, 2017-03-23

Re: [RFC PATCH v4 26/28] x86: Allow kexec to be used with SME

From: Tom Lendacky <hidden>
Date: 2017-03-06 18:20:12
Also in: kexec, kvm, linux-arch, linux-iommu, linux-mm, lkml

+kexec-list

On 3/6/2017 11:58 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
On 3/1/2017 3:25 AM, Dave Young wrote:
quoted
Hi Tom,
Hi Dave,
quoted
On 02/17/17 at 10:43am, Tom Lendacky wrote:
quoted
On 2/17/2017 9:57 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:47:55AM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
quoted
Provide support so that kexec can be used to boot a kernel when SME is
enabled.
Is the point of kexec and kdump to ehh, dump memory ? But if the
rest of the memory is encrypted you won't get much, will you?
Kexec can be used to reboot a system without going back through BIOS.
So you can use kexec without using kdump.

For kdump, just taking a quick look, the option to enable memory
encryption can be provided on the crash kernel command line and then
Is there a simple way to get the SME status? Probably add some sysfs
file for this purpose.
Currently there is not.  I can look at adding something, maybe just the
sme_me_mask value, which if non-zero, would indicate SME is active.
quoted
quoted
crash kernel can would be able to copy the memory decrypted if the
pagetable is set up properly. It looks like currently ioremap_cache()
is used to map the old memory page.  That might be able to be changed
to a memremap() so that the encryption bit is set in the mapping. That
will mean that memory that is not marked encrypted (EFI tables, swiotlb
memory, etc) would not be read correctly.
Manage to store info about those ranges which are not encrypted so that
memremap can handle them?
I can look into whether something can be done in this area. Any input
you can provide as to what would be the best way/place to store the
range info so kdump can make use of it, would be greatly appreciated.
quoted
quoted
quoted
Would it make sense to include some printk to the user if they
are setting up kdump that they won't get anything out of it?
Probably a good idea to add something like that.
It will break kdump functionality, it should be fixed instead of
just adding printk to warn user..
I do want kdump to work. I'll investigate further what can be done in
this area.

Thanks,
Tom
quoted
Thanks
Dave
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help