Thread (111 messages) 111 messages, 9 authors, 2017-03-23

Re: [RFC PATCH v4 07/28] x86: Provide general kernel support for memory encryption

From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date: 2017-02-20 18:38:53
Also in: kvm, linux-arch, linux-iommu, linux-mm, lkml

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:43:32AM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
Adding general kernel support for memory encryption includes:
- Modify and create some page table macros to include the Secure Memory
  Encryption (SME) memory encryption mask
- Modify and create some macros for calculating physical and virtual
  memory addresses
- Provide an SME initialization routine to update the protection map with
  the memory encryption mask so that it is used by default
- #undef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT in the compressed boot path

Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+#define __sme_pa(x)		(__pa((x)) | sme_me_mask)
+#define __sme_pa_nodebug(x)	(__pa_nodebug((x)) | sme_me_mask)
+
 #else	/* !CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT */
 
 #ifndef sme_me_mask
@@ -35,6 +42,13 @@ static inline bool sme_active(void)
 }
 #endif
 
+static inline void __init sme_early_init(void)
+{
+}
+
+#define __sme_pa		__pa
+#define __sme_pa_nodebug	__pa_nodebug
One more thing - in the !CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT case, sme_me_mask is 0
so you don't need to define __sme_pa* again.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help