On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 6:45 PM Oscar Salvador [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:00:24AM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
quoted
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1376,6 +1376,39 @@ static void remove_hugetlb_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page,
h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid]--;
}
+static void add_hugetlb_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page,
+ bool adjust_surplus)
+{
+ int zeroed;
+ int nid = page_to_nid(page);
+
+ VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!HPageVmemmapOptimized(page), page);
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&hugetlb_lock);
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->lru);
+ h->nr_huge_pages++;
+ h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid]++;
+
+ if (adjust_surplus) {
+ h->surplus_huge_pages++;
+ h->surplus_huge_pages_node[nid]++;
+ }
+
+ set_compound_page_dtor(page, HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR);
+ set_page_private(page, 0);
I think this has already been discused, so sorry about this.
The only reason to need the set_page_private() is because of the dissolving
function right? add_hugetlb_page() can only get reached via free_huge_page(),
or dissolve_free_huge_page, and while the former clears the flags, the latter
it does not.
Not exactly right. free_huge_page() does not clear HPageTemporary
if the page is temporarily allocated when freeing. You are right that
dissolve_free_huge_page() does not clear HPageFreed.
I think this function would benefit from some renaming. add_hugetlb_page() gives
me no hint of what is this about, although I can figure it out reading the code.
Because I think it is the reverse operation of remove_hugetlb_page,
I named it add_hugetlb_page. Do you have any suggestions for
renaming?
Thanks.
With that: Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador [off-list ref]
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3