Re: [PATCH v23 6/9] mm: hugetlb: alloc the vmemmap pages associated with each HugeTLB page
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Date: 2021-05-10 10:47:40
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Date: 2021-05-10 10:47:40
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:00:24AM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c@@ -1376,6 +1376,39 @@ static void remove_hugetlb_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page, h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid]--; } +static void add_hugetlb_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page, + bool adjust_surplus) +{ + int zeroed; + int nid = page_to_nid(page); + + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!HPageVmemmapOptimized(page), page); + + lockdep_assert_held(&hugetlb_lock); + + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->lru); + h->nr_huge_pages++; + h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid]++; + + if (adjust_surplus) { + h->surplus_huge_pages++; + h->surplus_huge_pages_node[nid]++; + } + + set_compound_page_dtor(page, HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR); + set_page_private(page, 0);
I think this has already been discused, so sorry about this. The only reason to need the set_page_private() is because of the dissolving function right? add_hugetlb_page() can only get reached via free_huge_page(), or dissolve_free_huge_page, and while the former clears the flags, the latter it does not. I think this function would benefit from some renaming. add_hugetlb_page() gives me no hint of what is this about, although I can figure it out reading the code. With that: Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador [off-list ref] -- Oscar Salvador SUSE L3