Re: [PATCH 15/26] docs: i2c: smbus-protocol: enable kernel-doc function syntax
From: Jean Delvare <hidden>
Date: 2020-01-20 14:44:48
Also in:
linux-i2c, lkml
From: Jean Delvare <hidden>
Date: 2020-01-20 14:44:48
Also in:
linux-i2c, lkml
On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 23:50:01 +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
Hyperlinks from function names are not generated in headings. Move them in the plain text so they are rendered as clickable hyerlinks.
typo: hyperlinks
While there also remove an unneeded colon in a heading. Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net> --- Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst | 64 ++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst b/Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst index 10c4a989982c..997945e90419 100644 --- a/Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst +++ b/Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst@@ -62,8 +62,10 @@ This sends a single bit to the device, at the place of the Rd/Wr bit:: Functionality flag: I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_QUICK -SMBus Receive Byte: i2c_smbus_read_byte() -========================================== +SMBus Receive Byte +================== + +Implemented by i2c_smbus_read_byte()
In file i2c-protocol.rst, the wording used is: This corresponds to i2c_transfer(). For consistency, can we settle for "Implemented by foo()" everywhere? Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <redacted> -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support