Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: Update the maxitems number of resets and reset-names
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2023-02-16 08:13:31
Also in:
linux-riscv, lkml, netdev
On 15/02/2023 08:46, yanhong wang wrote:
On 2023/2/7 15:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:quoted
On 07/02/2023 03:43, yanhong wang wrote:quoted
On 2023/1/18 23:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:quoted
On 18/01/2023 07:16, Yanhong Wang wrote:quoted
Some boards(such as StarFive VisionFive v2) require more than one value which defined by resets property, so the original definition can not meet the requirements. In order to adapt to different requirements, adjust the maxitems number definition. Signed-off-by: Yanhong Wang <redacted> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml index e26c3e76ebb7..baf2c5b9e92d 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml@@ -133,12 +133,9 @@ properties: - ptp_ref resets: - maxItems: 1Also, this does not make sense on its own and messes constraints for all other users. So another no for entire patch.Thanks. Change the properties of 'resets' and reset-names like this: resets: minItems: 1 maxItems: 2 reset-names: minItems: 1 maxItems: 2 Is it right? Do you have any other better suggestions?Isn't this allowing two reset items for every variant of snps,dwmac?Sorry for not getting back to you faster. After referring to the above modification, i used the command 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' to check all the bindings(including 'starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml'), no errors are reported, and the errors reported by Rob Herring are gone.
I don't see how does it answer my question. I claim you loosen the constraints and allow now two resets for everyone. You say you don't see errors. I never claimed there will be errors. I claimed what I said - you allow now to reset everywhere, which might not be correct description of every hardware. Best regards, Krzysztof