Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] net: phy: adin1100: Add initial support for ADIN1100 industrial PHY
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Date: 2021-07-23 17:33:18
Also in:
lkml, netdev
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 02:33:58PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 04:06:24PM +0300, alexandru.tachici@analog.com wrote:quoted
From: Alexandru Tachici <redacted> The ADIN1100 is a low power single port 10BASE-T1L transceiver designed for industrial Ethernet applications and is compliant with the IEEE 802.3cg Ethernet standard for long reach 10 Mb/s Single Pair Ethernet. Ethtool output: Settings for eth1: Supported ports: [ TP MII ] Supported link modes: 10baseT1L/Full 2400mv 1000mvThe SI unit of voltage is V not v, so milli-volts is mV not mv. Surely, at the very least, we should be using the SI designation in user visible strings? It may also be worth providing a brief description of 10BASE-T1L in the cover letter so (e.g.) one doesn't have to look up the fact that the voltage level is negotiated via bit 13 of the base page. I've found that by searching google and finding dp83td510e.pdf
I'm curios how the voltage should be actually chosen? In the adin1100 datasheet i read: "The 1.0 V pk-pk operating mode, external termination resistors and independent Rx/Tx pins make the ADIN1100 suited to intrinsic safety applications" "For long reach/trunk applications the higher transmit amplitude of 2.4 V pk-pk" So, it seems to depends on: - do we have safety requirements? - how long is the cable? Can we use 2.4V any time if it is available or it is bad idea for short cables? Regards, Oleksij -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |