On Wednesday 06 January 2016 01:12 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:

Hi,

Am 06.01.2016 um 00:40 schrieb Nishanth Menon [off-list ref]:

quoted

On 01/05/2016 06:01 AM, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:

quoted

+		rtc {
+			compatible = "ti,palmas-rtc";
+			interrupt-parent = <&palmas>;
+			interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;

IRQ_TYPE_NONE is not correct here -> it should have some polarity - if
it had none, there'd be no interrupt, right?

Well, it just translates IRQ_TYPE_NONE through

Linux/include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h

to

interrupts = <8 0>;

which is given as an example in

Documentation//devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-palmas.txt

Since I don't know anything about the rtc driver beyond the bindings documentation I assume it is correct...
I have added Laxman Dewangan because he introduced this interrupts = <8 0>;

As this is for palmas interrupt controller, it does not use the second 
field for interrupt from RTC.
So there is no really any polarity. It can be set to 0.

The second argument will be used for GPIOs mainly. However, support need 
to be added on GPIO driver for rising/falling configuration.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html